concerning your critiques because damn, man, you've got balls of steel and it's rather impressive--but it's almost too much balls especially wasting precious frustration on a website such as this one
so what i'm saying is, i applaud you for your stance
what i don't applaud is how you show your stance off and your way of argument (which is constructed poorly--and not because you tend to go toward the aggressive side of things, i do aswell, countless and meaningless times--but i would prefer if you tried to be unique with your message, makes things far more fun)
i'm actually not insulted by the fact you're going on about work that isn't actually worth two flying fucks in the end, because it's simple math, with the fact dA is unfortunately turning toward something like photobucket--and this is a definitely an agreeable stance.
i feel like you have shitloads of potential but you tend to ring out derogatory statements rather than channeling your attention towards the work itself and actually critiquing, which could help things immensely in the long run, i feel, rather than going with simple (rather true) statements about how 'this work is stupid', you would be best off explaining the because of it, why it's stupid, why the artist should implement different elements or just simply..why and how a piece is utter garbage (due to the fact it's an attention gaining medium)
so my question here is, why don't you do this? you and i both know that it's something far more than stupid, and there's a bigger picture. sort of like pointing out to corporate sell-outs, but just calling them traitors in the longrun with no actual substance to go by and not truly giving an impact?